| |
| Author |
Message |
|
Guest
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Guest
|
|
| Posted Sat Aug 09, 2008 |
|
damnn
|
|
|
|
 |
|
qutiiiee3 Supreme Member


Joined: 22 Aug 2008 Posts: 343
|
|
| Posted Wed Sep 03, 2008 |
|
seen better but deff not bad
|
|
|
|
 |
|
GUEST!!!!! Guest
|
|
| Posted Thu Sep 04, 2008 |
|
| qutiiiee3 wrote: | | seen better but deff not bad |
You say that as if simply by witnessing something "better" simply makes you somehow better. At this point its not even clear if this "better" experience you're referring to was a 1st degree witnessing or if you just saw a video.
So... what good is an argument if you cant propose an alternate method to prove your reason for challenging the initial cause of the argument?
A better choice of words would have simply been "not bad", or to put it in your butchered English language "deff not bad" because, to be honest, I personally don't care if you've seen better or not; it brings absolutely nothing to the table.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
qutiiiee3 Supreme Member


Joined: 22 Aug 2008 Posts: 343
|
|
| Posted Thu Sep 04, 2008 |
|
| GUEST!!!!! wrote: | | qutiiiee3 wrote: | | seen better but deff not bad |
You say that as if simply by witnessing something "better" simply makes you somehow better. At this point its not even clear if this "better" experience you're referring to was a 1st degree witnessing or if you just saw a video.
So... what good is an argument if you cant propose an alternate method to prove your reason for challenging the initial cause of the argument?
A better choice of words would have simply been "not bad", or to put it in your butchered English language "deff not bad" because, to be honest, I personally don't care if you've seen better or not; it brings absolutely nothing to the table. |
umm ok smart ass how does ive seen better make me look like im better are you on drugs? i was just saying that i witnessed better anddd seen a better video of skateboarding calm down its not that serious and thanks but i dont need you to tel me what choice of words i should have made i was better in english than anyone in my highschool and i dont need your lessons and if you dont care if i seen better or not then stfu and dont act al smart jerk
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Guest
|
|
| Posted Thu Sep 04, 2008 |
|
high school? LMAO, if you did good in high school that does not mean crap in the future. Heck i got a 3.0 GPA and ditched half the time. Doesn't mean I'm smart though, means I have good communication skills
|
|
|
|
 |
|
yes lav txa em Guest
|
|
| Posted Fri Sep 05, 2008 |
|
| Anonymous wrote: | | high school? LMAO, if you did good in high school that does not mean crap in the future. Heck i got a 3.0 GPA and ditched half the time. Doesn't mean I'm smart though, means I have good communication skills |
she didnt say shes smart do u know how to read and some people who do that are luky i knew guys who had 3.0 gpa also and they were idiotsss and maybe ur one too who knows highschool does do a lot actually if u think about it ull know
|
|
|
|
 |
|
qutiiiee3 Supreme Member


Joined: 22 Aug 2008 Posts: 343
|
|
| Posted Fri Sep 05, 2008 |
|
| Anonymous wrote: | | high school? LMAO, if you did good in high school that does not mean crap in the future. Heck i got a 3.0 GPA and ditched half the time. Doesn't mean I'm smart though, means I have good communication skills |
ok buddy i still have my brains fromhigschool but from what i see uve lost urs so shut up and keep the stupid opinion to urself eli
|
|
|
|
 |