_________________ dont press your luck with me cuz ill prove you dat u aint so luckkyyyy(:
Skitzawho Supreme Member
Joined: 14 Jul 2008 Posts: 492
Posted Thu Sep 18, 2008
/reappears
NEVER!!! YOU FIRST STUPID GIRL OF STUPIDNESS OF STUPIDLAND WHOSE STUPID
/disappears
DOC Supreme Member
Joined: 02 Jul 2008 Posts: 1149 Location: No place in particular
Posted Thu Sep 18, 2008
*Shoves a size 11 shoe up someones ass"
_________________ "The best thing about life is knowing that you put it together." - Trent Reznor
Skitzawho Supreme Member
Joined: 14 Jul 2008 Posts: 492
Posted Thu Sep 18, 2008
/reappears
/sees docs foot up stupid girl's ass
/laughs
/disappears
tupac biggie Guest
Posted Thu Sep 18, 2008
*[mod09: Language]*
IMLAZY818 Supreme Member
Joined: 01 Sep 2008 Posts: 563
Posted Fri Sep 19, 2008
Guest
Posted Fri Sep 19, 2008
tupac biggie wrote:
*[mod09: Language]*
ara eench language? I said 2 words that had to do with sex which was sex and vagina. mod 09 has some problems, big ups to mod 07 and 03.
Sev Member
Joined: 02 Jul 2008 Posts: 81
Posted Fri Sep 19, 2008
Anonymous wrote:
tupac biggie wrote:
*[mod09: Language]*
ara eench language? I said 2 words that had to do with sex which was sex and vagina. mod 09 has some problems, big ups to mod 07 and 03.
HAHA x100
SKIV2002 New Member
Joined: 27 Jun 2008 Posts: 8
Posted Wed Oct 22, 2008
MountainGirl wrote:
Someone explain to me the difference between a "*" and "non-*" dancer/dance studio. Seriously. Do try.
The majority of the members of our species store information in the form of concepts (i.e., which refers general representative of a group of similar objects, situations, ideas, or issues that are characterized or described cognitively by the most frequently observed traits) allowing for neurons to store nearly an infinite amount of information and both recollect and reorganize much quicker by reconstructing of the essential characteristics.
Prototype refers to mathematical average composite of a group that is believed to be the "ideal" representation.
Stereotype refers to categorization and association according to the most frequently exhibited and observed characteristics that are similar by members of a group or individuals.
I believe that the majority of the participants that use the term whore, are referring to the stereotypical whore (i.e., an individual, that may be either male or female, whose exhibited behaviors, including both verbal and non-verbal, and facial structure, which might suggest the person's androgen levels are relatively high, provide evidence that suggests he or she is relatively aggressive and delusional, is extremely extroverted and is highly motivated to participate in sexual intercourse, which consequently satisfies the stereotype or an individual conception of a whore), hence are dependent upon the connotative relations.
If necessary, I will discuss the ability of members of our species to accurately infer personality traits based on facial structure and permanent affective state. However, in order to avoid exhausting the reader, I will proceed with such a discussion only if provoked.
The denotation of or societies universal understanding of the term whore is intended to refer to a woman whose primary motivation, quite possibly purpose in life, and most frequently exhibited behavior is sexual intercourse or fornication. I believe that the definition requires revision in order to include males whose primary motives, interests, thoughts, and behaviors are focused on fornicating rather than developing stable long-term relationship in order to assure reproductive success.
"Reproductive success" is also an extremely complex concept which would require a more elaborate discussion.
Based on my cognitive development of the stereotypical whore and subsequent inferences, the majority of the females and males that are a member of current popular culture (i.e., the traditions and behaviors promoted, encouraged, and exhibited by the majority of the members of society) are most probably associated with the stereotypical whores. Such an inference merely suggests to the individual that the female is desperately searching for attention, quite possibly depressed and slightly delusional, and most probably motivated to further distract the self from reality by submitting to her primitive "reproductive" instincts, which might be a consequence of high concentration of androgen (i.e., refers to the male sex hormones) levels.
*Shamiram* Supreme Member
Joined: 19 Aug 2008 Posts: 314
Posted Wed Oct 22, 2008
^^^Skiv, do refrain from similar "analyses" in the future. You embarass yourself. Seriously.
SKIV2002 New Member
Joined: 27 Jun 2008 Posts: 8
Posted Wed Oct 22, 2008
*Shamiram* wrote:
^^^Skiv, do refrain from similar "analyses" in the future. You embarass yourself. Seriously.
Your claim is not supported by rationale, which suggests that you're an irrational lout whose primary motive is to evoke aggression in other individuals.
In addition, you might want to consider developing a slightly more valid understanding of the terms you use and the grammatical rules of the language prior to reattempting to advise me or engage in a dialectical discussion.
*Shamiram* Supreme Member
Joined: 19 Aug 2008 Posts: 314
Posted Wed Oct 22, 2008
SKIV2002 wrote:
*Shamiram* wrote:
^^^Skiv, do refrain from similar "analyses" in the future. You embarass yourself. Seriously.
Your claim is not supported by rationale, which suggests that you're an irrational lout whose primary motive is to evoke aggression in other individuals.
In addition, you might want to consider developing a slightly more valid understanding of the terms you use and the grammatical rules of the language prior to reattempting to advise me or engage in a dialectical discussion.
My husband just read your post (original) and says, "dude, lay off the thesaurus" .... dude, seriously, you're not the only one that can use "them big words", ya know? lol arguing with you would be too comical ... (oh, and have a sense of humor already!)
SKIV2002 New Member
Joined: 27 Jun 2008 Posts: 8
Posted Thu Oct 23, 2008
*Shamiram* wrote:
SKIV2002 wrote:
*Shamiram* wrote:
^^^Skiv, do refrain from similar "analyses" in the future. You embarass yourself. Seriously.
Your claim is not supported by rationale, which suggests that you're an irrational lout whose primary motive is to evoke aggression in other individuals.
In addition, you might want to consider developing a slightly more valid understanding of the terms you use and the grammatical rules of the language prior to reattempting to advise me or engage in a dialectical discussion.
My husband just read your post (original) and says, "dude, lay off the thesaurus" .... dude, seriously, you're not the only one that can use "them big words", ya know? lol arguing with you would be too comical ... (oh, and have a sense of humor already!)
Terms which a relatively unintelligent individual is unfamiliar with and lacks understanding of are considered "Big." The term which most accurately describes the terms I most frequently utilize is "Complex."
Referring to the terms I use as "big" merely suggests that the person is most probably uneducated and relatively inarticulate, evidenced by the inability to communicate the intended thought using the most valid terms for the specific context. From my perspective, your diction and conceptual understanding of the terms you're familiar with are extremely primitive and undeveloped.
For informational purposes, I spent quite a long duration during my younger years, and continue to spend my leisure time, developing a rational understanding of the terms I use.
Your careless and ignorant reactions, lack of understanding of the terms you use, inability to articulate, and lack of willingness to develop a rational understanding of the arguments and situations presented prior to reacting are more than sufficient evidence that allow one to conclude that you're an intellectually inferior member of society and relatively egotistic. Hence, not particularly worthy for one to spend time attempting to argue rationally.
I will attempt to resist and inhibit additional aggressive reactions towards you in order to avoid encouraging unnecessary, unproductive, and distressing social interactions.
If you inferred my reactions as relatively offensive, then I apologize for the aggressive reactions. However, I was merely defending myself against attempted ridicule and degradation by you in response to my opinions concerning the concept and stereotype of a whore.
Skitzawho Supreme Member
Joined: 14 Jul 2008 Posts: 492
Posted Thu Oct 23, 2008
Woah..... Owned.... Pwnt....
Miller Guest
Posted Thu Oct 23, 2008
(i would just like to make a random comment)
i love the name edward
and also skiv2002
i love your long remarks
and im not being sarcastic you sound very smart (:
the end.
(okay we can all go back to ignoring me now)
Guest
Posted Thu Oct 23, 2008
lol skiv is a trip, i love reading the long replies, good times.
Guest
Posted Fri Oct 24, 2008
SKIV2002 > Shamiram
Angel eyes Guest
Posted Fri Nov 07, 2008
Anonymous wrote:
Hey people. I have been wanting to join this dance group for a while now. What do you guys think of this place? Any good, bad stories?
I used to go there like six months ago. Very nice place. Luna herself is a reallyy nice teacher. Too bad I moved far away or else i would of never quit. The girls there are farrrrrrrr from being * or whores. They are really nice. U should go check it out.
It's a lot of fun but the dances are hard.
Anti-Virus Member
Joined: 22 Jul 2008 Posts: 157 Location: In front of a computer
(oh, and have a sense of humor already!)
